Re: pg_restore multiple --function options

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore multiple --function options
Date: 2013-08-27 19:55:57
Message-ID: 521D044D.2000302@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/27/2013 10:14 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Would anyone object to backpatching that change to 9.3 ? The risk seems
> very small, and it would be good to do the other options in the same
> release as --table. It was an oversight to only do it for --table in 9.3.
>
> Assuming no objections, I'll apply the attached patch to 9.3 and master
> later tonight.

That will pretty much force us to do an RC2, and therefore push back
final release date.

Just for consideration.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2013-08-27 20:14:58 Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-08-27 19:54:50 Re: Does larger i/o size make sense?