Re: 9.3 Reviewer Credit WAS: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.3 Reviewer Credit WAS: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up
Date: 2013-08-02 21:37:28
Message-ID: 51FC2698.6050405@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/02/2013 02:23 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I don't think dumping reviewer names at the bottom of the 9.3 release
> notes is what the majority want, and it seems like an ugly short-term
> solution.

It's better than not crediting the reviewers *at all*, which is the only
alternative I can think of.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-08-02 21:43:03 Re: how to pass data (tuples) to worker processes?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-08-02 21:36:42 Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up