From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: review: Non-recursive processing of AND/OR lists |
Date: | 2013-07-17 16:30:28 |
Message-ID: | 51E6C6A4.8020104@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/17/2013 05:21 AM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
>
>> I did a some performance tests of v5 and v6 version and there v5 is
>> little bit faster than v6, and v6 has significantly higher stddev
>>
>
> Thanks Pavel.
>
> The difference in average seems negligible, but stddev is interesting
> because v6 does less work than v5 in common cases and in the test that I
> had shared.
>
> The current commitfest (2013-06) is marked as 'In Progress', so is it okay
> to just mark the patch as 'Ready for Committer' or should I move it to the
> next commitfest (2013-09).
If this is actually "ready for committer", I'll mark it as such.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-07-17 16:46:08 | Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-07-17 14:11:28 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY. |