Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Ray Stell <stellr(at)vt(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u
Date: 2013-06-29 01:15:31
Message-ID: 51CE3533.2080507@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 6/28/13 6:06 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:44:00AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 5/28/13 10:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Wow, I never realized other tools used -U for user, instead of -u.
>>> Should I change pg_upgrade to use -U for 9.4? I can keep supporting -u
>>> as an undocumented option.
>>
>> It seems to me that that option shouldn't be necessary anyway.
>> pg_upgrade should somehow be able to find out by itself what the
>> superuser of the old cluster was.
>
> Uh, any idea how to do that?

select rolname from pg_authid where oid = 10;

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-06-29 01:43:35 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-06-28 23:14:28 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robins Tharakan 2013-06-29 01:34:10 Re: Add more regression tests for CREATE OPERATOR
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2013-06-29 00:14:37 Re: COPY and Volatile default expressions