| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Ray Stell <stellr(at)vt(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u |
| Date: | 2013-06-28 22:06:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20130628220611.GB13790@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:44:00AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/28/13 10:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Wow, I never realized other tools used -U for user, instead of -u.
> > Should I change pg_upgrade to use -U for 9.4? I can keep supporting -u
> > as an undocumented option.
>
> It seems to me that that option shouldn't be necessary anyway.
> pg_upgrade should somehow be able to find out by itself what the
> superuser of the old cluster was.
Uh, any idea how to do that?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-06-28 23:14:28 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-06-28 22:05:05 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-06-28 22:14:44 | Re: backend hangs at immediate shutdown (Re: Back-branch update releases coming in a couple weeks) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-06-28 22:05:34 | Re: New regression test time |