Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll
Date: 2013-06-27 18:47:48
Message-ID: 51CC88D4.2070901@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 06/27/2013 02:38 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> If we're going to try harder to ensure that reviewers are credited,
>> it'd probably be better to take both the commit log and the release
>> notes out of that loop.
> I'd pull the reviewers out of the CF app. Even in its current
> implementation, that's the easiest route.
>

I have not honestly found these to be terribly accurate.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-06-27 18:51:08 Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-06-27 18:38:11 Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll