Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll
Date: 2013-06-27 18:51:41
Message-ID: 20130627185140.GJ3757@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan escribió:
>
> On 06/27/2013 02:38 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>If we're going to try harder to ensure that reviewers are credited,
> >>it'd probably be better to take both the commit log and the release
> >>notes out of that loop.
> >I'd pull the reviewers out of the CF app. Even in its current
> >implementation, that's the easiest route.
>
> I have not honestly found these to be terribly accurate.

Yeah, they're not. I do take care to review past threads when crediting
reviewers in commit messages, and I don't even bother to look at the CF
app.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-06-27 19:02:27 Re: Computer VARSIZE_ANY(PTR) during debugging
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-06-27 18:51:08 Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll