Re: Last gasp

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Last gasp
Date: 2012-04-05 18:10:34
Message-ID: 4F7DE01A.80300@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05.04.2012 21:00, Robert Haas wrote:
> Heikki recently produced a revision of the check function patch, but
> I'm not sure whether he's planning to commit that or whether it's a
> demonstration of a broader rework he wants Pavel (or someone else) to
> do. At any rate, I think it's up to him whether or not to commit
> that.

Yeah, I guess it's up to me, now that I've touched that code. I don't
feel ready to commit it yet. It needs some more cleanup, which I could
do, but frankly even with the refactoring I did I'm still not totally
happy with the way it works. I feel that there ought to be a less
duplicative approach, but I don't have any more concrete proposals.
Unless someone more motivated picks up the patch now, I think it needs
to be pushed to 9.3.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-04-05 18:17:14 Re: Last gasp
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-04-05 18:07:20 Re: Publish checkpoint timing and sync files summary data to pg_stat_bgwriter