From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Last gasp |
Date: | 2012-04-05 18:10:34 |
Message-ID: | 4F7DE01A.80300@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05.04.2012 21:00, Robert Haas wrote:
> Heikki recently produced a revision of the check function patch, but
> I'm not sure whether he's planning to commit that or whether it's a
> demonstration of a broader rework he wants Pavel (or someone else) to
> do. At any rate, I think it's up to him whether or not to commit
> that.
Yeah, I guess it's up to me, now that I've touched that code. I don't
feel ready to commit it yet. It needs some more cleanup, which I could
do, but frankly even with the refactoring I did I'm still not totally
happy with the way it works. I feel that there ought to be a less
duplicative approach, but I don't have any more concrete proposals.
Unless someone more motivated picks up the patch now, I think it needs
to be pushed to 9.3.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-04-05 18:17:14 | Re: Last gasp |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-05 18:07:20 | Re: Publish checkpoint timing and sync files summary data to pg_stat_bgwriter |