Re: rc1 or beta4?

From: Dave Byrne <dbyrne(at)mdb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: rc1 or beta4?
Date: 2011-08-17 17:25:56
Message-ID: 4E4BF9A4.7070600@mdb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/17/2011 09:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I think you're imagining a lot more structure than actually exists in
> this project ;-). Anybody can edit that page, and there's no necessary
> consequence of something being written there. It's just notes to help
> us keep track of issues, not something graven on stone tablets.
>
> The pg_upgrade thing is listed as a beta blocker because I put it there
> --- but that's just my opinion. If it had proven hard to fix we might
> have concluded that we wouldn't let it block a beta release.
>
> If the plpython thing is a new crash that didn't exist before 9.1,
> my feeling is that it's a blocker.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

I can confirm that the bug in pg_upgrade has been fixed with Bruce's patch
in commit 2411fbdac448045a23eebf4f0dbfd5790ebad720

Thanks
Dave Byrne

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-08-17 17:26:53 Re: plpython crash
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-08-17 17:25:16 Re: A note about hash-based catcache invalidations