Re: rc1 or beta4?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Byrne <dbyrne(at)mdb(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: rc1 or beta4?
Date: 2011-08-17 20:04:55
Message-ID: 191.1313611495@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Byrne <dbyrne(at)mdb(dot)com> writes:
> I can confirm that the bug in pg_upgrade has been fixed with Bruce's patch
> in commit 2411fbdac448045a23eebf4f0dbfd5790ebad720

Thanks, I marked it resolved on the wiki page.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2011-08-17 20:29:32 Re: PL/Perl Returned Array
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-08-17 20:02:18 Re: A note about hash-based catcache invalidations