| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: index-only scans |
| Date: | 2011-08-11 21:01:53 |
| Message-ID: | 4E444341.5070409@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/11/2011 01:57 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
>> 1. The way that nodeIndexscan.c builds up the faux heap tuple is
>> perhaps susceptible to improvement. I thought about building a
>> virtual tuple, but then what do I do with an OID column, if I have
>> one? Or maybe this should be done some other way altogether.
>
> Maybe it's time to finally remove the been-deprecated-for-a-while OIDs?
As a user space option certainly. However they are also used to track
system objects, I don't know that we need to get rid of them for that
purpose. We just need to remove WITH/WITHOUT OIDS for user tables.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-08-11 21:06:34 | Re: index-only scans |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2011-08-11 20:57:39 | Re: index-only scans |