From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Single client performance on trivial SELECTs |
Date: | 2011-04-15 17:30:55 |
Message-ID: | 4DA880CF.8020103@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/15/2011 09:59 AM, Joshua Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> While it would be nice to improve our performance on this workload, let me point out that it's not a very important workload from the point of view of real performance challenges. Yes, there are folks out there with 100MB databases who only run one-liner select queries. But frankly, Valemort/Redis/Mongo are going to whip both our and MySQL's butts on that kind of workload anyway.
Yes but if we can kick MySQL's butt, that would certainly be a good
thing. There are people (lots of people) that do not like the whole
Valemort/Redis/Mongo paradigm.
> Certainly any sacrifice of functionality in order to be faster at that kind of trivial workload would be foolhardy.
Agreed.
JD
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Radosław Smogura | 2011-04-15 17:36:44 | Re: MMAP Buffers |
Previous Message | jagan | 2011-04-15 17:29:27 | Re: WAL, xl_heap_insert and tuple oid mystry |