Re: many schemas or many databases

From: Thomas Markus <t(dot)markus(at)proventis(dot)net>
To: PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: many schemas or many databases
Date: 2011-02-08 09:16:34
Message-ID: 4D5109F2.8000701@proventis.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

hi,

i would prefer many schemas. advantages:
- one backup/restore for all (or selective)
- one connection pool
- simple access to all schemas

regards
thomas

Am 08.02.2011 09:30, schrieb Szymon Guz:
> Hi,
> is there any noticeable difference between a cluster with many databases and
> a database with many schemas?
>
> I've got a quite huge database on Oracle with about 400 logically disjoint
> schemas.
> I could import that into PostgreSQL as many different databases, or as one
> database with many schemas.
>
> From the application point of view it could be easier to have different
> databases, as for now the applications log in into different schemas, so
> this behavior wouldn't change.
>
> Do you see any drawbacks of any of the solutions?
>
>
> regards
> Szymon
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2011-02-08 09:22:18 Re: [HACKERS] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries
Previous Message Nicklas Avén 2011-02-08 09:15:06 Re: <>(not equal to) in where clause can use index