Re: Per-column collation

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Per-column collation
Date: 2010-12-16 11:11:38
Message-ID: 4D09F3EA.7030907@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> We might need "previous reviewers" and "active reviewers" in commit-fest
> app. Or, should non-active reviewers delete their names?
>

This is only really an issue with patches that get moved from one CF to
the next, which doesn't happen that often. Patches that are marked
"Returned With Feedback" instead get a new entry in the next CF instead,
which avoids this problem.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2010-12-16 11:39:27 Re: proposal: auxiliary functions for record type
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2010-12-16 11:03:53 Re: Per-column collation