>> I thought the proposal on the table was to add "peer" (or some other
>> name) to refer to the unix-socket auth method, and use that term
>> preferentially in the docs, while continuing to accept "ident" as an
>> old name for it. Is that really too confusing?
What about the pg_ident file? Are we going to rename it? Are we
(better) going to have separate files for pg_peer and pg_ident?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com