Re: Indent authentication overloading

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Indent authentication overloading
Date: 2010-11-18 18:36:28
Message-ID: 4CE5722C.8050607@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/18/2010 01:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I thought the proposal on the table was to add "peer" (or some other
> name) to refer to the unix-socket auth method, and use that term
> preferentially in the docs, while continuing to accept "ident" as an
> old name for it. Is that really too confusing?

Not to me. And I think that's a good proposal.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-11-18 18:41:49 Re: Indent authentication overloading
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-18 18:36:08 Re: Indent authentication overloading