Re: cvs to git migration - keywords

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cvs to git migration - keywords
Date: 2010-07-15 17:26:19
Message-ID: 4C3F44BB.4030405@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 7/7/10, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> > So what happens right now using the existing git repository is that
>> > the $PostgeSQL$ tags are there, but they're unexpanded. They just say
>> > $PostgreSQL$ rather than $PostgreSQL: tgl blah blah$.
>>
>>
>> Really? All of them? Seems like that would have taken some intentional
>> processing somewhere.
>>
>
> AFAIK that's what CVS actually keeps in repo, it expands keywords
> when writing files out.
>
>

No. It stores the expanded keyword. Just look in the ,v files in a CVS
mirror and you'll see them.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2010-07-15 17:26:48 Re: SHOW TABLES
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2010-07-15 17:23:17 Re: SHOW TABLES