Re: Extensions User Design

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extensions User Design
Date: 2009-06-24 21:41:03
Message-ID: 4A429D6F.8050507@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Andrew,
>
>> Actually, I think we should be like Perl here. There is a list of
>> standard modules that comes with the base Perl distro, and then there
>> are addons, such as you find on CPAN. File::Find is an example of a
>> standard module, DBD::Pg is an example of an addon.
>
> Actually, chromatic, Allison, etc. regard the Standard Modules as a
> mistake and are talking about moving away from having any for Perl 6.
>
> On the other hand, their main reason for doing this (the issues with
> maintaining the included version and the CPAN version separately)
> wouldn't apply to us.

I agree they have too many. I think moving to none would be a mistake,
though. Would they even drop things like Dynaloader or
ExtUtils::MakeMaker? That would be crazy, IMNSHO. I think there's a
sweet spot here and we are not very far away from it in the number of
things we currently ship.

>
> On the third hand, having "all modules equal, just some recommended"
> approach woudl make it far easier to drop a module which went
> unmaintained, e.g. CUBE. But some people may regard this as a
> misfeature.

I would happily push cube out of the nest now :-)

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2009-06-24 21:56:21 Re: Extensions User Design
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-06-24 21:29:58 Re: Extensions User Design