Re: generic options for explain

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: generic options for explain
Date: 2009-05-26 14:54:54
Message-ID: 4A1C02BE.5090404@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2009 16:55:55 Dave Page wrote:
>
>> I was thinking something similar, but from the pgAdmin perspective. We
>> already use libxml2, but JSON would introduce another dependency for
>> us.
>>
>
> I was actually looking for a C library for JSON (json type for PostgreSQL; you
> know it is coming :-) ), but only found a library tied to glib, which,
> considering the experience with libxml, did not excite me. If someone knows
> of a different, small, and independent JSON library for C, I would like to
> hear about it.
>
>

There are several listed at <http://www.json.org/>

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-05-26 14:55:18 Re: problem with plural-forms
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-05-26 14:48:13 Re: generic options for explain