Re: generic options for explain

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: generic options for explain
Date: 2009-05-26 14:38:42
Message-ID: 200905261738.42578.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 26 May 2009 16:55:55 Dave Page wrote:
> I was thinking something similar, but from the pgAdmin perspective. We
> already use libxml2, but JSON would introduce another dependency for
> us.

I was actually looking for a C library for JSON (json type for PostgreSQL; you
know it is coming :-) ), but only found a library tied to glib, which,
considering the experience with libxml, did not excite me. If someone knows
of a different, small, and independent JSON library for C, I would like to
hear about it.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-05-26 14:40:48 Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-05-26 14:36:56 Re: generic options for explain