| From: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Date: | 2008-02-08 15:20:58 |
| Message-ID: | 47AC735A.7030604@wildenhain.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
>> Le Wednesday 06 February 2008 21:35:54 Peter Eisentraut, vous avez écrit :
>>> Yes, I feel we could use a group writeable patch queue of some sort.
>>> Perhaps an IMAP server setup could do the job.
>
>> I've read some developers appreciating the way review board works:
>> http://review-board.org/
>> http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/
>> http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/UserBasics
>
> Hmm, the info on that last page might be out of date, but what it says is
> that the only SCMS they really support 100% is SVN. The other ones they
> claim support for don't work [well/at all] with the post-review tool.
Btw, wasnt a group already playing with Trac/svn? This one also has
something like above: http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/PeerReviewPlugin
And a lot of more nice features as well as posgres backend support :)
Greets
Tino
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-02-08 15:22:08 | Re: Patch review |
| Previous Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2008-02-08 15:01:59 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |