Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
Date: 2008-01-21 17:36:43
Message-ID: 4794D82B.3070904@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>>> I read that Perl 5.10 is about to hit Fedora rawhide. Anyone know if
>>> it will work with plperl and/or DBD::Pg? If there are fixes needed
>>> in plperl, it'd sure be nice if they were in 8.3 ...
>>>
>>
>> I've tested 5.10 against both and they seem to work fine. My plperl
>> tests
>> are not necessarily thorough, but it compiled smoothly and ran a
>> bunch of
>> plperlu code without a problem. DBD::Pg worked fine, all its tests
>> passed.
>>
>>
>>
>
> For plperl, we need to test at least:
>
> * standard plperl regression tests
> * the UTF8 problem we recently fixed
>
>

First news is not good. On my test we have failed one of the regression
tests - the "use strict" processing seems to be backwards. I will try to
get to the bottom of it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2008-01-21 17:38:45 Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-21 17:31:39 Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce