Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
Date: 2008-01-21 15:05:04
Message-ID: 4794B4A0.6000509@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>> I read that Perl 5.10 is about to hit Fedora rawhide. Anyone know if
>> it will work with plperl and/or DBD::Pg? If there are fixes needed
>> in plperl, it'd sure be nice if they were in 8.3 ...
>>
>
> I've tested 5.10 against both and they seem to work fine. My plperl tests
> are not necessarily thorough, but it compiled smoothly and ran a bunch of
> plperlu code without a problem. DBD::Pg worked fine, all its tests passed.
>
>
>

For plperl, we need to test at least:

* standard plperl regression tests
* the UTF8 problem we recently fixed

I can check this out later today.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-21 15:33:13 Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-01-21 15:00:37 Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?