Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dave Page wrote:

>> A. Understand CVS
>> B. Understand HTML
>> C. Understand patch
>
> Rubbish. You send the text to -www.
>

Really? O.k. I need a page where I and Berkus can dynamically manage
sponsors. Where do I send the requirements to get that done?

> Using a wiki for a public website looks completely unprofessional and gives the impression of a small organisation without the resources to do things properly.

Cough.. hardly. The tool is not what makes it unprofessional, it is the
presentation.

>
> Implemented in the manner being suggested leaves us with little editorial control over what is published. I'm not so much concerned with deliberate vandalism but with ensuring all published content is factually correct, non-libellous, and consistent with the projects aims and past decisions on what we should or shouldn't publish.
>

I *repeat* I am not suggesting we change our web infrastructure, only
that the attitudes around it change a bit.

Joshua D. Drake

> Regards, Dave
>

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGtOwdATb/zqfZUUQRAuWGAJ9Bfrpq6Hsim2mwYvFwMKjDJR5uEQCgoNFy
uHs86YTURNUB5DUJ+KZjVOU=
=m7bw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----