Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Jeremy Haile <jhaile(at)fastmail(dot)fm>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux
Date: 2007-01-03 23:18:23
Message-ID: 459C39BF.4070403@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jeremy Haile wrote:
> I am sure that this has been discussed before, but I can't seem to find
> any recent posts. (I am running PostgreSQL 8.2)
>
> I have always ran PostgreSQL on Linux in the past, but the company I am
> currently working for uses Windows on all of their servers. I don't
> have the luxury right now of running my own benchmarks on the two OSes,
> but wanted to know if anyone else has done a performance comparison. Is
> there any significant differences?

That depends on your usage pattern. There are certainly cases where the
Win32 version will be significantly slower.
For example, if you open a lot of new connections, that is a lot more
expensive on Windows since each connection needs to execute a new
backend due to the lack of fork().

I don't think you'll find any case where the Windows version is faster
than Linux ;-) But to get a good answer on if the difference is
significant enough to matter, you really need to run some kind of simple
benchmark on *your* workload.

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2007-01-03 23:46:32 Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux
Previous Message Erik Jones 2007-01-03 18:59:40 Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?)