| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jeremy Haile <jhaile(at)fastmail(dot)fm> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux |
| Date: | 2007-01-03 23:46:32 |
| Message-ID: | 200701040046.32453.dim@dalibo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Le jeudi 4 janvier 2007 00:18, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
> But to get a good answer on if the difference is
> significant enough to matter, you really need to run some kind of simple
> benchmark on *your* workload.
To easily stress test a couple of servers and compare results on *your*
workload, please consider using both pgfouine[1,2] and tsung[3].
The companion tool tsung-ploter[4] (for plotting several results using common
graph, hence scales), may also be usefull.
[1]: http://pgfouine.projects.postgresql.org/
[2]: http://pgfouine.projects.postgresql.org/tsung.html
[3]: http://tsung.erlang-projects.org/
[4]: http://debian.dalibo.org/unstable/tsung-ploter_0.1-1.tar.gz
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://www.dalibo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig A. James | 2007-01-04 03:11:24 | Trivial function query optimized badly |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-01-03 23:18:23 | Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux |