| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with |
| Date: | 2006-11-18 20:03:20 |
| Message-ID: | 455F6708.706@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>>> So, if we'll not touch grammar, are there any issues with tsearch2 in
>>> core ?
>> Are there any issues with tsearch2 not in core?
>>
>
>
> Quite apart from anything else, it really needs documentation of the
> standard we give other core features.
>
> I think if a feature will be of sufficiently general use it should be a
> candidate for inclusion, and text search certainly comes within that
> category in my mind.
I agree here - full text search is of general use (and a very often
requested) feature - including it in core will both help us in marketing
postgresql (which should notbe seen as a "bad" thing at all) and more to
the point it provides an in-core user and showcase for two very powerful
and innovative technologies - GIST and GIN.
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-11-18 20:13:53 | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration |
| Previous Message | Rodrigo Hjort | 2006-11-18 19:34:50 | Ontology on PostgreSQL - is there something? |