| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with |
| Date: | 2006-11-18 18:37:50 |
| Message-ID: | 3191.24.211.165.134.1163875070.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>> So, if we'll not touch grammar, are there any issues with tsearch2 in
>> core ?
>
> Are there any issues with tsearch2 not in core?
>
Quite apart from anything else, it really needs documentation of the
standard we give other core features.
I think if a feature will be of sufficiently general use it should be a
candidate for inclusion, and text search certainly comes within that
category in my mind.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2006-11-18 18:47:53 | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch'sconfiguration |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-11-18 18:02:35 | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configur |