Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date: 2006-08-19 12:40:58
Message-ID: 44E706DA.6040407@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> I expect if you set up a web-based interface it won't be a matter of people
> digging in heels so much as just being indifferent to it. And like most
> projects the bugs will just accumulate and not get feedback.
>
>

And which projects would these be? Oddly enough it might surprise you
that the web has really matured.
All kinds of people use it now. You should really check it out.

;)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> Incidentally, does it also fix the issue with the database schema where the
> entire set of comments is stored in a single field of a single record and so
> when two people comment on a bug at the same time one stomps on the others
> changes?
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-19 12:50:41 Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2006-08-19 11:00:38 Concurrent connections in psql patch