Re: How to avoid transaction ID wrap

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Koichi Suzuki <suzuki(dot)koichi(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How to avoid transaction ID wrap
Date: 2006-06-07 11:48:50
Message-ID: 4486BD22.9030901@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Koichi Suzuki wrote:
> I've once proposed a patch for 64bit transaction ID, but this causes
> some overhead to each tuple (XMIN and XMAX). Pgbench with 64bit
> transaction ID has to pay about a couple of percent of performance.
> If 64bit transaction ID is a reasonable fix, I've already posted this
> patch. Anyone can apply this to later versions.
Did you check performance on 32-bit or 64-bit systems and 64-bit binary
version of PGSQL? I think that today is not problem to have 64-bit
architecture and 64-bit ID should increase scalability of Postgres.

Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-06-07 12:15:12 Re: How to avoid transaction ID wrap
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2006-06-07 11:14:49 self-deadlock at FATAL exit of boostrap process on read error