| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BLOBs etc |
| Date: | 2005-01-08 09:12:16 |
| Message-ID: | 41DFA3F0.4060606@opencloud.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Oliver Jowett wrote:
>
>> The "different ways" involve different transaction semantics. You
>> can't currently deal with LOBs when autocommit is on. How would you
>> deal with that?
>>
> I'm aware that the transaction semantics are somewhat different and I've
> proposed a solution for that on the hackers list. Please read my
> proposal in thread "Status of the server side Large Object support".
The thread in question is a month old; here's an archive link for the
benefit of the list:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-11/msg01018.php
The followups seemed to be along the lines of "use EXTERNAL storage and
improve bytea to support partial updates". Is your proposal a serious
candidate for merging?
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-01-08 10:55:49 | Re: BLOBs etc |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2005-01-08 02:39:17 | Translation update: pt_BR |