| From: | David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What's planned for 7.5? |
| Date: | 2004-01-20 06:20:31 |
| Message-ID: | 400CC8AF.6070305@zara.6.isreserved.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:12:28AM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
>>and cons, none is the "one size that fits all" magic solution. To select
>
> Does anyone realy believe that there can be a one size fits all
> solution? Heck, even Oracle and IBM offer a couple of different
> systems, depending on what you need. (That also suggests that any
> replication system need not always be shipped with the "basic"
> distribution, but could instead be integrated into a larger,
> postgresql_plus_enterprise_features.tgz or something like that.)
I don't, but consider Linux which can be configured to run on devices as
small as a wristwatch and as large as the the big irons...
--
dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-01-20 06:28:20 | [Fwd: plpgsql and booleans?] |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-01-20 05:16:32 | Re: SQL Exception Relation xxx does not exist |