Re: What's planned for 7.5?

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What's planned for 7.5?
Date: 2004-01-19 19:07:46
Message-ID: 20040119190746.GD4457@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:12:28AM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
> and cons, none is the "one size that fits all" magic solution. To select

Does anyone realy believe that there can be a one size fits all
solution? Heck, even Oracle and IBM offer a couple of different
systems, depending on what you need. (That also suggests that any
replication system need not always be shipped with the "basic"
distribution, but could instead be integrated into a larger,
postgresql_plus_enterprise_features.tgz or something like that.)

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-01-19 19:11:32 Re: set search_path and pg_dumpall
Previous Message ohp 2004-01-19 18:40:51 Re: Strange COPY from problem (resent)