Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Date: 2010-01-06 02:09:34
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb1001051809p1ac425c2l3a5e077ead1575cb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> This was probably discussed to death earlier, but: why was it decided to
> not simply use a different port for listening for walsender
> connections?

I believe that using a different port would make the setup
of replication messier; look for the unused port number,
open that port for replication in the firewall, etc.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-01-06 02:31:15 Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-01-06 01:51:36 Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling