Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Date: 2010-01-06 01:51:36
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb1001051751t68ad1f96pd53b31f07dcb8fa7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I think it would be better to utilize the existing array of child
> processes in pmsignal.c. Instead of having postmaster peek into
> WalSndCtlData, let's add a new state to PMChildFlags,
> PM_CHILD_WALSENDER, which is just like PM_CHILD_ACTIVE but tells
> postmaster that the child is not a normal backend but a walsender.

Seems good.

> I've done that in my git branch.

Could you push that git branch to a public place?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-01-06 02:09:34 Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-06 01:23:19 Re: Auto-extending table partitions?