Re: Configurable location for extension .control files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Oliver Charles <ollie(at)ocharles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Configurable location for extension .control files
Date: 2013-06-04 20:24:07
Message-ID: 3904.1370377447@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I don't really care much about Oliver's usecase TBH, but I would very much
> welcome making it easier for application developers to package part of
> ther in-database application code as extensions without either requiring
> a selfcompiled postgres with a custom extension dir or them having have
> root access to the machine running postgres.

Well, if you're installing an extension that includes C code, you're
going to need root access anyway to install the shlib (at least on
conservatively-configured machines). For pure-SQL extensions, Dimitri's
been pushing a different approach that needn't involve the filesystem at
all. We didn't get that finished in 9.3 but I think it's still on the
agenda for 9.4.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Charles 2013-06-04 20:24:43 Re: Configurable location for extension .control files
Previous Message Sean Chittenden 2013-06-04 20:23:21 Re: Improved error message for CREATE EXTENSION patch...