| From: | Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "felix(at)crowfix(dot)com" <felix(at)crowfix(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Date: | 2005-10-08 23:40:53 |
| Message-ID: | 330532b60510081640m2f35f20dkf5eed3f224ff2016@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
On 10/8/05, Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> This basically means that InnoDB table support must come out of the
> commercial MySQL.
For that matter, I'm not sure they can release MySQL under a
commercial license while incorporating 3rd party GPL works, without
the express permission of the copyright holders for those included
works.
Whatever deal they used to have just got changed, that's for sure.
-- Mitch
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2005-10-08 23:49:46 | Sun Involvements (was Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase) |
| Previous Message | Mitch Pirtle | 2005-10-08 23:35:11 | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2005-10-08 23:49:46 | Sun Involvements (was Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase) |
| Previous Message | Mitch Pirtle | 2005-10-08 23:35:11 | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |