| From: | Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "felix(at)crowfix(dot)com" <felix(at)crowfix(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Date: | 2005-10-08 23:35:11 |
| Message-ID: | 330532b60510081635s2b7503b6t274b76398ba7fb2d@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
On 10/8/05, felix(at)crowfix(dot)com <felix(at)crowfix(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I don't understand. If both MySQL and Innodb are GPL licensed,
> commercial or not should make no difference, and they can add all the
> GPL changes they want o the last Innodb GPL release.
They can only do the GPL stuff in the GPL-licensed MySQL; and they
cannot incorporate someone else's GPL works in a proprietary (non-GPL)
commercial release.
This basically means that InnoDB table support must come out of the
commercial MySQL.
-- Mitch
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mitch Pirtle | 2005-10-08 23:40:53 | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Matthew Terenzio | 2005-10-08 22:26:55 | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mitch Pirtle | 2005-10-08 23:40:53 | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-08 22:33:16 | Re: Dump all except some tables? |