| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GCC vs clang |
| Date: | 2010-11-16 15:16:49 |
| Message-ID: | 28276.1289920609@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
> I've been trying to get clang working enough that I can at
> least get HEAD going for a build farm client, and the attached
> patch is the bare minimum to get it working. There may be a
> better way to do this, but as indicated in a past thread, the
> GNU_SOURCE variable does not play nicely with clang. Getting that
> removed does allow me to do a working make and make check. The make
> takes orders of magnitude longer than gcc does, but that's an
> issue for another day.
What happens to plperl?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-16 15:23:50 | Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-11-16 15:15:56 | Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? |