GCC vs clang

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: GCC vs clang
Date: 2010-11-16 14:41:38
Message-ID: 20101116144138.GC2790@core.home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've been trying to get clang working enough that I can at
least get HEAD going for a build farm client, and the attached
patch is the bare minimum to get it working. There may be a
better way to do this, but as indicated in a past thread, the
GNU_SOURCE variable does not play nicely with clang. Getting that
removed does allow me to do a working make and make check. The make
takes orders of magnitude longer than gcc does, but that's an
issue for another day.

--
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201011160940
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

Attachment Content-Type Size
postgres.clang text/plain 451 bytes

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-16 14:42:41 Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-11-16 13:17:32 track_functions default