From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Command Triggers, v16 |
Date: | 2012-03-16 16:26:51 |
Message-ID: | 25220.1331915211@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> If you think "cmdtrigger" isn't a good name maybe you should have
>> picked a different one to start with.
> Well, I think it's a good internal name. I'm not too sure about exposing
> it, the only reason why it's a good name is because it's a single not
> too long word, after all. Not very SQLish.
> I'm putting cmdtrigger as the user visible name in the next version of
> the patch, if you come up with something potentially more user friendly
> feel free to suggest.
How about "commandtrigger" or "command_trigger"? Typing a few more
characters in this context doesn't seem like a deal-breaker to me.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-03-16 17:07:28 | Re: patch: autocomplete for functions |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-03-16 15:51:04 | Re: initdb and fsync |