Re: patch: autocomplete for functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch: autocomplete for functions
Date: 2012-03-16 17:07:28
Message-ID: 1331917648.8940.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2012-03-15 at 16:36 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue mar 15 16:25:53 -0300 2012:
> > On sön, 2012-02-19 at 20:10 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > > I found so this extremely simple patch should be useful.
> > >
> > > It helps for pattern SELECT fx();
> >
> > Isn't that just a subset of what I had proposed?
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1328820579.11241.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
>
> So do you intend to commit your patch?

Well, there was quite a bit of discussion about it, but it appears that
most concerns were addressed at the end. So yes, I guess, unless
someone wants further discussion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2012-03-16 17:07:43 Re: Proposal: Create index on foreign table
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-03-16 16:26:51 Re: Command Triggers, v16