Re: pg_class catalog question...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Thomas Hallgren" <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_class catalog question...
Date: 2006-04-02 19:45:27
Message-ID: 24673.1144007127@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Yep. However, I've wanted to add a constrained, fixed-length version
> of bytea for some time now; it's just not high on my priority list.

If you're expecting that you'll be able to write BYTEA(n) and avoid
storing a length word, you'll find that it's not a trivial matter.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-04-02 19:52:17 semaphore usage "port based"?
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-04-02 19:38:48 Re: pg_class catalog question...