Re: Schemas not available for pl/pgsql %TYPE....

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Schemas not available for pl/pgsql %TYPE....
Date: 2002-09-05 00:47:52
Message-ID: 24075.1031186872@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
> ::sigh:: Is it me or does it look like all
> of pl/pgsql is schema un-aware (ie, all of the declarations). -sc

Yeah. The group of routines parse_word, parse_dblword, etc that are
called by the lexer certainly all need work. There are some
definitional issues to think about, too --- plpgsql presently relies on
the number of names to give it some idea of what to look for, and those
rules are probably all toast now. Please come up with a sketch of what
you think the behavior should be before you start hacking code.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-05 01:46:36 Re: Schemas not available for pl/pgsql %TYPE....
Previous Message Sean Chittenden 2002-09-05 00:38:00 Re: Schemas not available for pl/pgsql %TYPE....

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-05 01:01:38 Re: Open pg_dump issues
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2002-09-05 00:41:48 Re: PL/Perl?