Re: Schemas not available for pl/pgsql %TYPE....

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Schemas not available for pl/pgsql %TYPE....
Date: 2002-09-05 01:46:36
Message-ID: 200209050146.g851kbx27900@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
> > ::sigh:: Is it me or does it look like all
> > of pl/pgsql is schema un-aware (ie, all of the declarations). -sc
>
> Yeah. The group of routines parse_word, parse_dblword, etc that are
> called by the lexer certainly all need work. There are some
> definitional issues to think about, too --- plpgsql presently relies on
> the number of names to give it some idea of what to look for, and those
> rules are probably all toast now. Please come up with a sketch of what
> you think the behavior should be before you start hacking code.

Added to TODO:

o Make PL/PgSQL %TYPE schema-aware

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Reinhard Max 2002-09-05 09:13:07 Re: Bug #756: suggestion: file with password instead of
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-05 00:47:52 Re: Schemas not available for pl/pgsql %TYPE....

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Sampson 2002-09-05 01:57:05 Re: Inheritance
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2002-09-05 01:09:06 Re: Multibyte support in oracle_compat.c