Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c
Date: 2014-01-28 16:20:39
Message-ID: 23562.1390926039@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2014-01-28 11:14:49 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> OK, so does anyone object to removing this comment line?

> Let's just not do anything. This is change for changes sake. Not
> improving anything the slightest.

Indeed. I'd actually request that you revert your previous change to the
comment, as it didn't improve matters and is only likely to cause pain for
future back-patching.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-01-28 16:22:23 Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-01-28 16:18:26 Re: Suspicion of a compiler bug in clang: using ternary operator in ereport()