Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)
Date: 2009-01-27 20:09:37
Message-ID: 22261.1233086977@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think both of these deserve at least a glance by a committer before
>> bouncing them.

> While we're at it, I think the Ramon Lawrence/Bryce Cutt patch to
> "Improve Performance of Multi-Batch Hash Join for Skewed Data Sets"
> also deserves a look.

There is no proposal or intention to bounce any of the remaining
commitfest items without consideration. SEPostgres and Hot Standby
are the ones under debate.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-01-27 20:11:35 Re: pg_upgrade project status
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-27 20:07:46 Re: 8.4 release planning