| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |
| Date: | 2009-01-27 21:08:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1233090523.2820.0.camel@dell.linuxdev.us.dell.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 15:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I think both of these deserve at least a glance by a committer before
> >> bouncing them.
>
> > While we're at it, I think the Ramon Lawrence/Bryce Cutt patch to
> > "Improve Performance of Multi-Batch Hash Join for Skewed Data Sets"
> > also deserves a look.
>
> There is no proposal or intention to bounce any of the remaining
> commitfest items without consideration. SEPostgres and Hot Standby
> are the ones under debate.
>
I must have misunderstood Peter's comment.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-01-27 21:09:16 | Re: pg_upgrade project status |
| Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2009-01-27 21:05:34 | Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning) |