Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review
Date: 2015-01-26 19:11:54
Message-ID: 20150126191154.GC5568@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-01-26 14:05:03 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> This capability would be used in conjunction with the SAN snapshot
> capability, it's not intended to be a comparison to what SANs offer.

Oh, on a reread that's now clear. Many of those actually allow hooks to
be run when taking a snapshot, that'd probably be a better approach. But
I can now see the point.

Thanks,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-01-26 19:21:13 Re: Windows buildfarm animals are still not happy with abbreviated keys patch
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-01-26 19:10:20 Re: Windows buildfarm animals are still not happy with abbreviated keys patch