Re: [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED
Date: 2014-11-15 04:23:58
Message-ID: 20141115042358.GT1791@alvin.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier wrote:

> Btw, perhaps this diff should be pushed as a different patch as this is a
> rather different thing:
> - if (heapRelation->rd_rel->relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED
> &&
> + if (indexRelation->rd_rel->relpersistence ==
> RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED &&
> !smgrexists(indexRelation->rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM)
> As this is a correctness fix, it does not seem necessary to back-patch it:
> the parent relation always has the same persistence as its indexes.

There was an argument for doing it this way that only applies if this
patch went in, but I can't remember now what it was.

Anyway I pushed the patch after some slight additional changes. Thanks!

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-11-15 04:27:30 Re: New storage parameter pages_per_range not mentioned in CREATE INDEX doc
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-11-15 04:22:32 Re: Useless dead struct in parse_func.h